Is Machinery Twin right for your workflow?

Use this guide to decide whether Machinery Twin fits the engineering question in front of you. It shows the workflows it supports today, alongside the boundaries that need a different model or deployment.

A good fit

PLC-driven motion inspection

Connect supported PLC data to a configured machine model and inspect how axes, mechanisms, cams, and state respond to the running program. The connection carries values from the PLC into the twin.

Read the hardware-in-the-loop guide

A good fit

Standalone motion studies

Run the same machine model with simulated variables and state machines to explore a sequence before connecting a PLC.

Read about standalone simulation

A good fit

Presenting a machine concept

Use a kinematic model to make a machine cycle, mechanism, or motion concept visible in a presentation or discussion.

Read about presentation mode

Not a current fit

Sensor-feedback sequence testing

Machinery Twin does not write simulated sensor values back to the PLC. Full closed-loop sensor-feedback testing is outside the current connection workflow.

Use a different model scope

Forces, contact, or process simulation

Machinery Twin models geometry, positions, and motion. Use a physics, contact, or process model when forces, loads, material behavior, or process physics determine the result.

Planned

Air-gapped deployment

Pro requires sign-in and online entitlement validation. Offline, machine-locked licensing is planned for deployments that cannot connect to the internet.

Discuss offline requirements

Your controller runtime, PLC simulation software, and network setup remain separate from Machinery Twin. Current live connections support Siemens S7, TwinCAT ADS, and OPC UA; PLCSIM Advanced connects directly, while PLCSIM Basic requires a bridge such as NetToPLCSim.

Start with the question you need to answer.

Explore a machine model in the browser, or tell us about your PLC, machine, and the behavior you want to investigate.